14 Ağustos 2012 Salı

Review: The Campaign

To contact us Click HERE

It was only a matter of time before Will Ferrell adapted his trademark character, which channels childlike behavior into a large adult body, to the realm of politics, where it seems to fit perfectly. In the new movie The Campaign Ferrell stars as Cam Brady, a congressman from North Carolina who seeks to defend his seat during the latest election.
At first Cam runs unopposed. But a couple of sleazy, wealthy businessmen, the Motch brothers (Dan Aykroyd and John Lithgow) decide they want to set up a factory in a small town, complete with underpaid Chinese workers ("it'll save on shipping costs!"), and they need a political patsy to help set this evil plan into action. So they choose the ridiculous Marty Huggins (Zach Galifianakis), so pathetic that he never seems to be able to open a door.
Cam and his campaign manager Mitch (Jason Sudeikis) think defeating Marty will be like shooting fish in a barrel, but then the Motch brothers hire a super-manager, Tim (Dylan McDermott), to handle Marty's campaign. ("I'm here to make you not suck.") Tim hangs an oil painting of an eagle over Marty's fireplace, and the race is on.
From there, the movie is a series of dirty tricks, played back and forth between the two candidates. Fortunately, even if these seem predictable, they usually take unexpected turns. In one scene, Cam comes to visit Marty in an attempt at a truce. Marty gives Cam large glassfuls of brandy, and Cam drives away, completely inebriated. Marty calls the cops and they pull over Cam. None of that is too surprising, but Cam's reaction -- and the choice of camera angles -- is hilarious.
Whereas Ferrell is inherently funny, the jury is still out on Galifianakis. He seems to require heavy exterior stimulus for his humor; his characters are clueless, and he invites cruelty and ridicule upon himself. In one scene, Cam presents a "bio" of Marty's life, which includes several embarrassing photos (such as his membership in a workout class for overweight women). While these may be among Galifianakis' funniest moments, Galifianakis himself doesn't have to do anything during them; most of his humor is based on reaction.
Of course, the movie edges toward the defeat of the malicious, greedy corporate types, which are easily the most satisfying kinds of movie villains today (we don't need foreigners as a threat anymore; the wealthiest Americans are scary enough). Mr. Aykroyd in particular seems to have come full circle, here playing the type of character he helped to take down in Trading Places, though in the 1980s, he ended the film with a great deal of wealth. Nowadays, it's enough for the heroes of The Campaign to come out as good people, regardless of wealth.
Writers Chris Henchy and Shawn Harwell were already securely in the Will Ferrell comedy camp, but director Jay Roach (the Austin Powers films, Meet the Parents, Dinner for Schmucks, etc.) is a newcomer, and he jumps right in to Ferrell's brand of comedy. It's definitely outrageous, but it never winks at the audience or cracks up at itself; it lets the audience find its own laughter.
Perhaps the funniest scene is one in which Marty challenges Cam to recite the Lord's Prayer. Cam, who clearly doesn't know it, asks for all cameras to be turned off, and everyone's eyes to be closed. Then Mitch tries to mime the prayer for Cam to interpret, and the results are endlessly brilliant, if perhaps only slightly sacrilegious.
Any movie about politics today has to have some satirical elements, and The Campaign has them too, but subtly and in passing, such as a quick shot of a clearly rigged, corporate-sponsored, computerized voting booth, which some viewers will associate with the 2004 voting in Ohio.
Overall, however, The Campaign is more about getting laughs than votes. In that regard, Ferrell is a consummate entertainer, apparently less concerned with politics than with telling the next joke.

Review: The Bourne Legacy

To contact us Click HERE

To start, "The Bourne Legacy" looks like a reboot, but is mainly a sequel.
Either way, it's a mostly unnecessary addition to the smart, exciting Bourne trilogy.
The new movie's story takes place more or less during the events of the previous movie The Bourne Ultimatum (2007). Matt Damon is not here, but his Jason Bourne is in the story's sidelines, appearing as a phantom in documents and news reports, and spoken of in hushed tones.
The focus is now Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner), another super-secret agent of the same ilk, who must take special green and blue pills to give him a genetic edge. But while in the field he loses his pills and has to get more before his brain and body shut down.
At the same time, the entire "Treadstone" program is being terminated, and all the agents are being killed. Aaron gets away and makes his way to the home of scientist Marta Shearing (Rachel Weisz), who likewise survived an attack on her lab.
Together, and hunted all the way, they make their way to Manila, to another lab where they can make Aaron a permanent super-spy.
The director on this new movie is Tony Gilroy, who wrote, or co-wrote all three previous Bourne movies, and directed the excellent Michael Clayton (2007). His screenplay here is of the highest showmanship, sounding intelligent and dramatic, while covering up and smoothing out some hokey plot twists.
His direction, coming after Doug Liman on the first film, and Paul Greengrass on the second two films, leaves a bit to be desired.
This entry is much longer than the other films, and the pacing feels off-kilter. It takes a while to get going, and the most exciting set-piece, a motorcycle chase, goes on far too long, and comes too close to the end. The movie ends too abruptly.
Gilroy's action sequences jump all over the place. He's clearly more comfortable with tense dialogue, characters in rooms barking at one another or studying computer screens.
For his part, Renner, though a bit cooler than Damon -- and at his best in The Hurt Locker, Mission: Impossible - GhostProtocol and The Avengers -- is a more-than-capable action hero.
Overall, like the recent The Amazing Spider-Man, this new Bourne is mostly fine, but it feels more like the product of a business strategy than any genuinely artistic urge to tell a great story.

Blu-ray Review: Rio Grande

To contact us Click HERE
In exchange for the funds to make his dream project The Quiet Man(1952), director John Ford agreed to make this low-budget Cavalry Western for Republic Studios. But it's far from a throwaway; it became the third part of Ford's "Cavalry Trilogy" and it's every bit as good as the other two, Fort Apache (1948) and She Wore a Yellow Ribbon (1949). In fact, I like it better than the problematic Fort Apache; it's far simpler and more effective.
John Wayne plays Lt. Col. Kirby Yorke, a career soldier stationed near the Rio Grande. Though the Apache keep attacking, he's under orders not to cross the river. Unexpectedly, his son Jeff (Claude Jarman Jr.), who has just flunked out of school, turns up as an enlisted man. His mother, and Kirby's former flame Kathleen (Maureen O'Hara) arrives to retrieve him. A deserter accused of manslaughter figures into the plot.
Ford's usual band of character actors, Victor McLaglen (who drinks and brawls a lot), Ben Johnson, and Harry Carey Jr. all turn up, and the Sons of the Pioneers -- themselves playing soldiers -- occasionally break out in song. Bert Glennon provided the luscious black-and-white cinematography, with its many effective night shots.
Artisan released the DVD in 2002; it comes with a commentary track by the wonderful Ms. O'Hara. In 2012, Olive FIlms released a glorious Blu-ray edition, sadly, without said commentary track. But it does contain a 20-minute making of featurette (hosted by Leonard Maltin), and a trailer.

Blu-ray Review: Johnny Guitar

To contact us Click HERE
One of Nicholas Ray's best films, the garish, full-color Freudian Western Johnny Guitar (1954) is an amazing, weird movie that's not easy to get the first time around.
Star Joan Crawford is at her finest. Dressed all in black, she's Vienna, a saloon-keeper who supports a new railroad coming through town, though most of her customers, cattle ranchers, oppose it. The cattle ranchers are led by the unstable, shrieking Emma Small (Mercedes McCambridge), a villainess so weirdly stiff and angry that she makes your fists clench.
Johnny Guitar is sometimes called a "Freudian" Western, for its backwards sexual motivations, and belongs to a fascinating subgenre of movies with strong matriarchs: Marlene Dietrich in Fritz Lang's Rancho Notorious (1952) and Barbara Stanwyck in Samuel Fuller's Forty Guns (1957).
Sterling Hayden co-stars in the title role, though he's mostly window dressing. He "saves" the day at the end, but it's clear that Vienna and Emma are the movie's true opposing forces. Scott Brady co-stars as "The Dancin' Kid," who comes between Vienna and Emma. Other regular Western character actors like Ward Bond, Ernest Borgnine, and John Carradine show up as well.
The movie is shot in garishly bright colors, and looks and feels strange. I suspect that on the whole Ray's films were too potent, and too full of blood and lust and life to please large audiences. Johnny Guitar's glaring colors burst from the screen, its performances are high-pitched to the point of near-hysteria. But it's a gloriously controlled film, with every piece in place exactly as Ray intended.
Ray had an uncanny knack for establishing a physical space that somehow echoed his characters' emotional state. Picture the planetarium in Rebel Without a Cause, the courtyard in In a Lonely Place (1950), or the snow-covered countryside in On Dangerous Ground (1952). Here, the hilltop hideout underlines the film's hysterical showdown.
Philip Yordan is credited with the screenplay, which is adapted from Roy Chanslor's novel. Harry Stradling was the cinematographer, working with "Trucolor," the lower-rent version of Technicolor that Republic Pictures -- normally a "B" picture studio -- used. Victor Young composed the score, with Peggy Lee singing the title song.
After years of this film being unavailable on DVD in the United States, Olive Films has finally released an official U.S. DVD and Blu-ray. It's not flawless, given the nature of the original material, but it's so nice to have it at last in a high-quality transfer. The only extra, sadly, is the original 3-minute Martin Scorsese introduction that was taped for the VHS release back in the 1990s. But I'm not complaining.

Blu-ray Review: Bound

To contact us Click HERE
Bound has been given a new Blu-ray release for 2012. The following is the breathless review I wrote after I saw the film in 1996. 
Bound joins the list of excellent, violent and itelligent crime movies of the nineties that includes: The Grifters; After Dark, My Sweet; Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Miller's Crossing, Fargo, One False Move and Devil in a Blue Dress. It's also a terrific lesbian movie because it doesn't seem to care that it's a lesbian movie. Bound is more interested in its plot and characters than its sexual politics.
I don't want to give anything away, so, in one sentence, Boundis about gangster's moll Violet (Jennifer Tilly) and ex-jailbird handywoman Corky (Gina Gershon) falling in lust with one another and trying to steal $2 million of the mob's money from Violet's boyfriend Caesar (Joe Pantoliano). Some of this stuff I've seen before, a lot of it I haven't, and I was on the edge of my seat most of the time.
The movie was written and directed by the Wachowski brothers -- Larry and Andy -- and it's their first. I seems as if they wanted to film in black and white (it's likely that the money hungry producers wouldn't let them) because everything is composed in harsh blacks and whites. Even Jennifer Tilly's lipstick is black. The color red comes into the equation every once in a while, if you know what I mean. If you're disturbed by red, better watch something else.
There's a sex scene between Gershon and Tilly that's already been much-discussed. It's worth your attention. The best part is watching Gershon's toes curl.
Since 1996, Larry Wachowski has undergone a sex change and is now Lana Wachowski. One wonders if this had anything to do with the movie's sexual politics (or refreshing lack thereof)? In 2012, the new Blu-ray edition features a very good high-definition transfer, but with no extras, including no subtitles. Strangely, the disc comes with both the theatrical cut and the unrated cut, which runs -- get this -- 14 seconds longer. Really... is anyone going to watch the shorter version at this point?